Lamu:A civil society group, Save Lamu, is urging the government and the proponents of the proposed Dangote Lamu oil refinery to present documentation proving compliance with legal requirements before further construction progresses.
According to Kenya News Agency, Save Lamu Secretary General Mohammed Athman highlighted that in May, Aliko Dangote claimed he was unfamiliar with Lamu. However, by September, he joined President William Ruto for the groundbreaking of what is described as one of Kenya’s largest proposed industrial developments. President Ruto assured full government support, emphasizing that bureaucratic delays would be avoided.
Lamu County Governor Issa Timamy expressed skepticism about groups that have legally challenged the project. Athman, accompanied by activists from various local alliances and displaced farmers, alleged that the national government bypassed public consultation, allowing Dangote to proceed without compensating landowners in the Kwasasi and Magogoni areas.
Save Lamu clarified they support industrialization and foreign investment but criticized the lack of legal adherence in initiating the project. Athman pointed out that the decision to establish the Dangote Oil Refinery was made between May and September, without following due process, even by the county government.
In a statement, Save Lamu referenced constitutional articles on transparency, accountability, and public participation, stating no documents have been shared publicly to demonstrate compliance. The refinery is planned on 7,000 acres, capable of processing 700,000 barrels of oil, and includes a 1,000 MW power plant. Athman noted the absence of a project-specific Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and a public NEMA license record.
Save Lamu has given the national government and Dangote Oil Refinery 14 days to address residents’ concerns, warning of potential legal action. The group has previously succeeded in legal cases, such as the fishermen compensation for Lamu Port impacts and halting the Amu Coal Plant due to environmental concerns.
Community members like Abubakar Twalib and Ali Hassan have criticized the lack of clarity on the project’s impact on local livelihoods and compensation for displaced residents. They argue the project could harm fishing grounds and pastoral lands, with inadequate job opportunities for the youth.
Kwasasi landowner Amina Mohammed reported displacement without compensation, lamenting the loss of her cashew nut trees. Save Lamu demands specific details on project benefits and compensation for affected residents.
