Kenya to host global science and innovation conference

Kenya garnered 84 votes to beat Quebec-Canada which got 18
Kenya has won the bid to host the 2024 International Association of Science Parks and Innovation Areas conference in a voting done in Saville, Spain.
The bid was won by Konza Technopolis Development Authority (KoTDA) and supported by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). According to MFA, Kenya got 84 votes ahead of Quebec-Canada, which garnered 18 votes.
KoTDA CEO John Tanui, speaking recently at an investor’s forum, said the International Association of Science Parks and Innovation Areas brings together over 300 members from 75 countries across the world with Konza being one of them and Kenya chairs the African continent.
“I also sit on the board of that global organization so we are able to see what is happening across the world in that space and this means we are connected to any other place of science and technology,” said the CEO.
He explained that Konza is a smart city as it focuses on sustainability by concentrating on aspects such as zero net carbon emissions, energy efficiency and using ICT as an efficient means of interaction, service delivery.
“We are a city being built from scratch and very few cities in the world are built from scratch which is special in the region and the world at large,” said Tanui.
He explained that phase one of the Konza Technopolis vertical infrastructure is 80 percent complete, providing the requisite amenities necessary for investors who have already started construction works for their investments.
Tanui said that the vertical infrastructure incorporates roads, water, electricity, solid waste system, and all the other amenities for a city and they have constructed them to world class standards to ensure that the infrastructure is futuristic, resilient, sustainable and able to be a model for other developments in the country and regionally.
“We have some of the latest world class infrastructure at Konza. When we talk about roads, we are talking about street scapes where we have additional facilities like cycling lanes, green spaces, allocation for things like internet cables, water pipes, waste water among others,” said Tanui. (KNA)

Source: MY Gov

Konza Wins Bid To Host The International Science Parks Conference In 2024

Kenya has won the bid to host the 2024 International Association of Science Parks and Innovation Areas conference in a voting done in Saville, Spain.
The bid was by Konza Technopolis Development Authority and supported by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA).
According to MFA, Nairobi, Kenya got 84 votes ahead of Quebec Canada which garnered 18 votes.
Konza Technopolis Development Authority (KoTDA) CEO John Tanui speaking recently at an investor’s forum said that the International Association of Science Parks and Innovation Areas brings over 300 members from 75 countries across the world with Konza being one of them and Kenya chairs the African continent.
“I also sit on the board of that global organization so we are able to see what is happening across the world in that space and this means we are connected to any other place of science and technology,” said the CEO.
He explained that Konza is a smart city in that it focuses on sustainability by concentrating on aspects such as zero net carbon emissions, energy efficiency and also using ICT as an efficient means of interaction, service delivery and ensuring quality of service and quality of life to the residents of the city.
“We are a city being built from scratch and very few cities in the world are built from scratch which is special in the region and the world at large,” said Tanui.
He explained that phase one of the Konza Technopolis vertical infrastructure is 80 percent complete providing the requisite amenities necessary for investors who have already started construction works for their investments.
Tanui said that the vertical infrastructure incorporates the roads, water, electricity, solid waste system, and all the other amenities for a city and they have constructed them in world class standards to ensure that the infrastructure is futuristic, resilient, sustainable and able to be a model for other developments in the country and regionally.
“We have some of the latest world class infrastructure at Konza. When we talk about roads, we are talking about street scapes where we have additional facilities like cycling lanes, green spaces, allocation for things like internet cables, water pipes, waste water among others,” said Tanui.

Source: Kenya News Agency

Garissa Referral Hospital To Offer Free Fistula Treatment

Women suffering from fistula in Garissa County have been encouraged to come out and seek treatment free of charge at the Garissa County Referral Hospital.
The treatment is being sponsored by the Department of Health in partnership with the Fistula Foundation.
Female Genital Fistula is a condition where women leak urine and stool after giving birth. It is a common occurrence when a mother undergoes prolonged and obstructed labour.
Another cause of Fistula especially in the north eastern region is FGM.
So far, over 200 women from Garissa and neighbouring counties have benefitted from screening. 87 of them have got high quality surgery repair and post-operative care.
Acting Garissa Referral Hospital CEO Dr. Hawa Bakari called on residents with family members suffering from this condition to bring them to the facility to receive corrective treatment.
The average cost of reconstructive surgery to correct obstetric fistula in a public hospital is Sh60, 000 which is unaffordable to many.
Dr. Hawa said with the assistance of Fistula Foundation, the hospital was now a routine fistula repair facility catering for all suffering patients.
Acting Health Chief Officer Mohamed Salat and Fatuma Iman, the County Reproductive Health Coordinator also called on women suffering from the condition to come out and seek treatment at the referral hospital adding that they should not be suffering in shame while the condition was treatable.
“It is encouraging that hundreds of women have been screened so far with many benefitting from free fistula treatment. We are aiming to transform lives on the maternal health front. I would like to urge women who are suffering from fistula to come forward and receive treatment,” Salat said.
“We are urging those who are confined in their houses to come out and receive treatment. Fistula is not a shame. Our mission is to empower women by letting them enjoy a quality and dignified life in the society,” Fatuma added.
Gynecologist Dr. Lado Ismail said his department was ready and equipped to handle all cases noting the Fistula Foundation had supported the training of two surgeons at the hospital to do the fistula repair surgeries as well as training four nurses to work and assist the doctors.

Source: Kenya News Agency

Irrigation Schemes To Lift Food Security-PS Torome

The government is keen on expanding irrigation schemes and reviving stalled ones across the country towards scaling up food security and enhancing value addition.
Principal Secretary for the State Department for Planning in the National Treasury and Planning, Mr. Saitoti Torome, said pastoralist counties that have experienced recurrent famine as a result of drought, would be given priority in the new and revived schemes targeting to offer improved incomes for residents.
Torome noted that due to effects of climate change, most parts of the country were experiencing unreliable rainfall and erratic weather patterns with farmers often running into huge losses when their crops failed.
Speaking at a Nakuru hotel during deliberations by experts on preparation of the Medium-Term Plan Strategy Paper (MTP) No 4, the Principal Secretary added that although the soil in most parts of Kenya is fertile, dependence on the rain-fed farming system has precluded agriculture as an alternative food source.
He added, “In MTP No 4, we are going to emphasize on expansion and intensification of agriculture through irrigation, with a focus on crop diversification, poverty alleviation, food security and improved quality of life for the rural population. This is an initiative that will impact positively on farmers who will now have sufficient water to irrigate their crops and make the most out of it in revenues,” the PS expounded.
According to the Principal Secretary, the MTP No 4 will also outline effective ways of ensuring Kenya to attain Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and that every Kenyan is enrolled in the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF).
“Implementing a UHC scheme through the NHIF will require the enhancing of the NHIFs capacity to design and implement the technical requirements of an efficient insurance-based approach,” noted Torome.
He said President William Ruto’s government was committed to ensuring that Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) had access to accessible and affordable credit facilities under state-backed credit guarantee schemes.
A credit guarantee scheme encourages banks to disburse credit to borrowers they would otherwise turn away, confident that they will be compensated in case of defaults.
Last year, a study by the Central Bank of Kenya showed that banks turned away 28 percent of small businesses while microfinance institutions declined 96 percent of their loan applications.
While noting that the Jubilee administration had sunk billions of shillings into infrastructure projects, a good number of which it handed over to the new government at various stages of completion, Saitoti affirmed that ongoing projects will not to be abandoned.
“The seamless transfer of responsibilities is meant to ensure that the country is not littered with white elephants, which would be the case if every new administration abandons its predecessor’s work,” he said.
He advised county administrations to work out plans of continued execution of existing projects initiated by their predecessors in order to save taxpayers from losses arising out of incomplete investments that gobble up billions without offering a tangible return.

Source: Kenya News Agency

Sh6-8 Billion Assets Recovered By EACC

The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) recovers Sh6 billion to Sh8 billion returned to the government annually from proceeds of corruption.
In the process, the EACC disrupts fraudulent deals of up to Sh10 billion every year before suspects begin such corrupt activities to finally get prosecuted.
While speaking during a three-day training for journalists in Kisumu, the Commission’s Head of Corporate Affairs and Communication Erick Ngumbi, said over the last three years, they recovered assets worth Sh22.5 billion.
Ngumbi further revealed that EACC has asset recovery cases across the country worth Sh33 billion.
“Kenya is a very rich country with adequate resources able to pay its debts, so long as we manage wastage, sealed corruption loopholes,” he explained.
He said though much more needed was to be done, the Commission has done a lot which the society does not appreciate but calls EACC a toothless bull-dog that could not bite.
Ngumbi pointed out that although respective counties were expected to do oversight, their impact could not be felt as some County Assemblies have become bedfellows with the executive.
This, therefore, leaves room for unscrupulous Governors to take advantage and compromise Members of the County Assemblies (MCAs) to play along, he noted.
The three-day training for 30 journalists was also graced by the EACC Deputy Director, Dr. Emily Mworia, Regional Manager George Oira and Lidya Manyasi Deputy Director, Education and Public Awareness.

Source: Kenya News Agency

Distribute The Relief Food To Deserving Kenyans, Garissa CC

Garissa County Commissioner Boaz Cherutich has warned officials involved in distribution of relief food issued by the government to vulnerable households in the county against diverting the food elsewhere.
Speaking to the press at the Garissa National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB) store after witnessing offloading of the second batch of food allocated to Garissa Sub Counties, Cherutich said that the Deputy County Commissioners and chiefs have been instructed to only distribute the food to deserving Kenyans.
The food is part of the consignment that was flagged off by President William Ruto Monday to famine-stricken families.
Speaking during the flagging off at State House Nairobi, Ruto said the relief food would benefit 3.5 million Kenyans affected by the drought that has ravaged 23 counties across the country.
In Garissa, which remains on the alert phase, a total of 336,000 people have been affected by the severe drought translating to 56,000 households.
All the ten sub counties will receive a total of 2,000 bags of rice, 3,600 – 50kg bags of beans and 1,000 cartons of corned beef.
“We have instructed all the sub county steering committees where the Deputy County Commissioners and the Sub County Administrators representing the governor sit, the National Drought Management Authority (NDMA) officials, Kenya Red cross and all the elected leaders to sit and ensure that this food is distributed to deserving Kenyans,” Cherutich said.
“The NDMA has already done the mapping and they have the names of those who are vulnerable and therefore all chiefs have been instructed to ensure that the food is not diverted elsewhere. We will be monitoring and any issue of diversion of food will be dealt with firmly,” he added.
The County Commissioner further asked the village elders to be keen on the exercise and report immediately on any kind of relief food diversion to undeserving people who were not captured on the vulnerable persons list.
He thanked the KDF and the World Food Programme (WFP) for supporting the transportation of the consignment to various points and logistical support respectively.
The administrator said that NGOs and Community Based Organizations in the county had been supporting the school feeding programme to ensure that children from the affected areas remain in school.
He noted that the government was working closely with other partners including UNICEF that is the lead agency on the children sector to ensure that those children who have dropped out of school are supported back to school.
Garissa County NDMA Coordinator Abdinoor Dubow said that the county steering committee would continue to meet on a regular basis to analyze the situation and assess the drought with a view to ensuring that the affected households are reached both for food and non-food items.
“This drought is not different from the episodes of the drought that we had previously, only that we are having successive failed rains and seasons for four years which has taken away the communities’ coping mechanism to absorb these shocks,” Dubow said.
He said that the NDMA would procure livestock feeds which were expected in the next two weeks.
The Kenya Livestock Marketing Council Vice Chairman Dubat Amey while commending the government’s effort to address the drought issue called for the upscaling of the cash transfer programme as well as quick release of the livestock feeds.

Source: Kenya News Agency

Sh30 Million Ultramodern Recreational Park Launched

Kwale Governor Fatuma Achani has launched a Sh30 million recreational public park project in Kwale town, the County headquarters.
The site of the park has been the venue of national day celebrations and other important occasions for decades and the objective behind this initiative is to make the headquarter town a “modern, equitable and a sustainable town”.
Governor Achani said the proposed Baraza Park would boast landscaping, walking track, food court, cabro paving, free high-speed Wi-Fi to enable visitors’ access internet services and installation of streetlights project within Kwale town.
She said the devolved unit has just begun to build an urban green space to increase the quality of the urban environment and provide recreational opportunities to residents.
Other facilities include toilets, dedicated play areas for toddlers, open-air gyms jogging and cycling tracks.
She said the park would also allow residents seeking services from county and national government offices a conducive waiting recreational spot adding that recreational areas were great places for communities to come together, get to know each other and just enjoy the outdoors.
She said the proposed Baraza Park hosts many old indigenous trees that would be preserved because they constitute an environmental and cultural heritage.
She said parks are important to urban environments, residents and visitors besides providing environmental services such as air purification.
“We will conserve the environment around the park for sustainability, tranquility and splendor and provide a green ambience for all,” she said.
She went on, “The new park will be an integrated urban picturesque destination for tourism, culture, festivals, dining and relaxation”.
She said the main objective of the open space management in urban centres was to amongst other things establish eco-friendly open spaces that are safe, attractively designed, well managed for the benefit of communities.
The county boss said the management of the modern park shall come under the purview of the Kwale Municipality noting that the proposed park would not only improve the ecology but also the overall quality of life for the residents.
Accompanied by her Deputy Chirema Kombo, Achani stated that her administration was committed to develop Kwale town in a planned manner.
She called on the people to make use of the modern facilities and informed that all the main parks in the county would also be modernised to ensure a pleasant atmosphere for the people.
Achani underscored the need to protect, maintain and preserve public designated places to promote social cohesion and improve the quality of life of the people.
“We will continue to establish and develop public parks in various urban centres to promote healthy, recreational attractions for families,” she said adding parks would spur businesses and other economic activities in the region.
Governor Achani said the park is a great next milestone for the county integrating the natural environment that would be enjoyed for many years to come by residents and visitors.

Source: Kenya News Agency

Ahead of Elections, Peacekeeping Mission Drawdown in Democratic Republic of Congo, Security Situation Still Dire, Special Representative Tells Security Council

Despite progress in preparations for its general elections, as well as in its financial governance, the Democratic Republic of the Congo continues to face a deteriorating security situation amid ongoing violence by armed groups against civilians, the top United Nations official in the country told the Security Council today ahead of ongoing plans for the mission’s withdrawal.
Bintou Keita, Special Representative of the Secretary-General in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Head of the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), noting the promulgation of the revised electoral law, commended the work of the Government, Parliament and the Independent National Electoral Commission to establish the legal framework and conditions for the proper conduct of the elections. The adoption of the 2023 budget of $14.6 billion will provide the Electoral Commission with the necessary means for the electoral process.
Highlighting the persisting security challenges in the eastern part of the country due to abuses perpetrated by various armed groups, she called for the strengthening of the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC). “An estimated 27 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance,” she said, adding that the surge in internal displacement since January 2022 has brought the total number of displaced people to 5.5 million — the largest caseload in Africa. She called on Congolese authorities to ensure the safety of humanitarian personnel and safe delivery of assistance.
Regional initiatives are under way to support stabilization in the east and the easing of regional tensions fueled by the M23’s resurgence, she pointed out. The operational means and other resources necessary must be mobilized to ensure that the provincial authorities have the capacities required to implement the Disarmament, Demobilization, Community Recovery and Stabilization Programme. The Mission is continuing to discharge its mandate so that its withdrawal from the three last provinces where it remains can occur in a calm, responsible and sustainable manner, she affirmed.
Michel Xavier Biang (Gabon), Chair of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1533 (2004) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, briefed the Council on the Committee’s work since 5 October 2021. Together with Committee members, he will visit the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda and Uganda to obtain first-hand accounts concerning the implementation of the sanctions measures imposed by resolution 2360 (2017), he said. The notification requirements for the delivery of materiel to Congolese forces — except for five categories of weapons listed in an annex to resolution 2641 (2022) — were abolished with the adoption of that resolution on 30 June.
Emery Mudinga, Director of the Angaza Institute, pointed out that the Democratic Republic of the Congo has the largest amount of tropical forest in the Congo Basin. However, many armed groups operating in the forests of the eastern part of the country are involved in various illegal exploitation activities, causing the forest to shrink by 1 million hectares each year, posing consequences for food security and agricultural production. Citing possible measures to address the problem, he said the Council could finance projects and road infrastructure in forested areas to facilitate the monitoring of illicit activity and adopt sanctions to end the purchase and sale of wood by rebel groups and the Government.
In the ensuing discussion, delegates urged support for regional cooperation initiatives and offered ways to remedy the security situation. Speakers also stressed the need to protect civilians while underscoring that MONUSCO’s withdrawal is contingent on the achievement of benchmarks set forth in the transition plan.
Kenya’s representative, also speaking for Gabon and Ghana, stressed that MONUSCO must prioritize the protection of civilians and improve troop preparedness through capacity-building and training. Voicing concern over the strained relations and hostilities between MONUSCO and the local populations, he urged greater effort to rebuild trust and confidence between them. He backed the Congolese Government’s call for MONUSCO to review the joint transition plan and ensure the benchmarks encompass, among others, strengthening key defense and security institutions.
The delegate for the United States, pointing out that the 23 March Movement remains designated under the 1533 sanctions regime, said Member States are obligated to freeze the armed group’s assets and ensure that no funds or economic resources are made available to it. Noting the tragic deaths of United Nations peacekeepers and civilians in recent months, he said it is vital to speak out against anti-United Nations rhetoric, which undermines the ability of peacekeepers to carry out their mandates.
In the same vein, the speaker for Mexico condemned the disinformation campaigns that led to violent protests against MONUSCO and the killing of peacekeeping personnel and civilians. He stressed the need to prevent the illicit flow of weapons to strip illicit armed groups of their capacity to destabilize the country.
Burundi’s representative expressed support for regional approaches, particularly the Nairobi process, which aim to bring peace between the armed forces and Government on one hand and between the warring local communities on the other. His country, as a rotating Chair of the East African Community, will do everything in its power to actively participate in all United Nations and African initiatives aimed at restoring peace and international security.
The representative of the Democratic Republic of the Congo called for the withdrawal of occupying forces from the east, particularly the M23 supported by Rwanda. On the Nairobi process, he said that while the political track is under way, with respect to the incorporation of rebel groups into the Demobilization, Disarmament, Community Recovery and Stabilization Programme, the comprehensive operationalization of that process requires funding. On the military track, there is a need to tackle defiant negative elements such as the M23, the Cooperative for Development of the Congo (CODECO) in Ituri and the Mai-Mai in South Kivu, he said, calling on the countries of origin of those negative elements to implement the process to reabsorb those fighters.
Further, the plan for MONUSCO’s drawdown must be reevaluated, he said, stressing the need to protect civilians, and for sufficient means to purchase equipment. He called on the Council to support, among others, the inviolability of his country’s borders, the immediate withdrawal of forces from Bunagana, and the stepping up of sanctions against groups exploiting his country’s natural resources.
Rwanda’s representative pointed out that some Congolese leaders’ tendency to scapegoat Rwanda for political attention only serves to deepen anti-Rwandan sentiment. If this hate speech continues, it will exacerbate the problems in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and further divide the country by deepening hatred and mistrust among Congolese communities. Blaming others for that country’s internal failures is problematic, he said, calling on the Government to accept its obligations and implement existing, signed peace agreements.
Also speaking today were representatives of Ireland, Norway, United Kingdom, Mexico, India, United Arab Emirates, Albania, Brazil, Russian Federation, China and France.
The meeting began at 10:01 a.m. and ended at 12:03 p.m.
Briefings
BINTOU KEITA, Special Representative of the Secretary-General in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Head of the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), highlighted significant progress since her June briefing in the preparations for the general elections to be held in the country by December 2023. The promulgation of the revised electoral law on 29 June; the development of its implementation measures by the Independent National Electoral Commission; the implementation of topical consultation frameworks with women, youth, political parties and civil society; and the preparations for the launch of a voter registration drive in December are important steps. She commended the efforts of the Government, parliament and the Electoral Commission to establish the legal framework and conditions for the proper conduct of the elections. However, significant challenges remain, particularly in reaching a broad consensus on the various aspects of the electoral process, she said, affirming MONUSCO’s willingness to facilitate dialogue and ensure a transparent, inclusive and peaceful process.
The regular parliamentary session that opened on 15 September, on the 2023 budget, provides an opportunity to address the socioeconomic challenges facing the country, she said. The proposed 2023 budget of $14.6 billion submitted to the National Assembly — 32 per cent more than 2022 — marks significant progress in financial governance. Its adoption should make it possible to expedite implementation of the development programme for the 145 territories and to give the Electoral Commission the necessary means for the electoral process. The Parliament must also consider the 2022-2025 military programming law, estimated at $1 billion per year — crucial to allow the increase of the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC) and to implement security sector reform. Noting the persisting security challenges in the eastern part of the country, she called for the empowerment of the FARDC, as armed groups continue to commit violence against civilians. Most abuses are being perpetrated by the Allied Democratic Forces, the Cooperative for Development of the Congo (CODECO) and the 23 March Movement (M23) in Ituri and North Kivu, while Mai-Mai groups and other militias have intensified attacks on civilians in South Kivu, she added.
“An estimated 27 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance, with many having protection needs,” she said, noting that the surge in internal displacement since January has brought the total number of displaced people to 5.5 million — the largest caseload in Africa. Also, in July attacks against aid workers reached their highest level since the beginning of the year, with 34 security incidents recorded, she said, calling on the Congolese authorities to take all necessary steps to ensure the safety of humanitarian personnel and installations and to provide security for the delivery of life-saving assistance. So far, the 2022 Humanitarian Response Plan for the country has received 37 per cent of the $1.88 billion required, she said, urging donors to continue their support. MONUSCO remains fully mobilized to address the persistent insecurity created by the criminal activities of armed groups in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Describing its various efforts in that regard, she said the Mission is working with the FARDC to conduct joint offensive operations in areas affected by CODECO, in compliance with the United Nations Human Rights Due Diligence Policy.
Regional initiatives are also under way to support stabilization in the east and the easing of regional tensions fuelled by M23’s resurgence, without which no lasting peace is possible, she said. These initiatives and the deployment of troops from East African Community countries must go hand in hand with non-military measures. Noting victims of violence perpetrated by armed groups have high expectations of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Community Recovery and Stabilization Programme, she stressed: “We must mobilize the operational means and other resources necessary to ensure that the provincial authorities have the capacities required to implement this programme.” She encouraged financial partners to support in the coming months implementation of the provincial operational plans being drawn up in order to swiftly seize existing disarmament opportunities in Ituri, North Kivu, South Kivu and Tanganyika. The programme must contribute to reconciliation through close coordination with the transitional justice process, she said, commending Government progress in this regard, notably through the launch of national popular consultations in six provinces by the Ministry for Human Rights, as well as President Felix Tshisekedi’s statement against tribalism and hate speech to the General Assembly. She encouraged the country to continue its efforts and strengthen its legal arsenal to fight against these abuses, particularly through the adoption of the bill tabled in Parliament against tribalism, racism and xenophobia.
She went on to say that the deteriorating security situation in the east of the country has provided fertile ground for manipulation and stigmatization of MONUSCO, leading to new violent demonstrations and serious incidents resulting in the death of some dozen protestors and four MONUSCO personnel. She commended the efforts of Congolese authorities, civil society and influential personalities calling for calm and restraint in an extremely difficult security context and urged them to continue in that regard to enable MONUSCO to fully resume its operations in the east of the country without hindrance. Following these incidents, President Tshisekedi has instructed his Government to re-evaluate the transition plan in order to expedite the pace of MONUSCO’s withdrawal, she said, adding that the Mission is fully prepared to work closely with the Government in that regard. “We remain mobilized to continue to discharge the mandate that the Council has entrusted to us,” she stressed, adding that it is doing so in close cooperation with the Government, agencies, funds and programmes and the other regional and international partners, “in order to ensure that the withdrawal once and for all of the Mission from those three last provinces where it remains, can occur in a calm, responsible and sustainable manner.”
MICHEL XAVIER BIANG (Gabon), Chair of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1533 (2004) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, then briefed the Council on the Committee’s work since 5 October 2021. In that period, the Committee held five in-person meetings and met via video teleconference on four occasions. On 14 January, it heard a presentation from the Coordinator of the Group of Experts outlining its workplan for the mandate that ended on 1 August 2022. On 15 March, the Committee was briefed by Antoinette N’Samba Kalambayi, Minister for Mines of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, on the illicit exploitation of mineral resources. On 13 May, the Committee heard a presentation by the Coordinator of the Group of Experts regarding its final report, subsequently discussing the findings and recommendations contained therein.
He also reported that, on 1 July, the Committee was briefed by Virginia Gamba, Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict, on the situation of children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. On 15 July, the Coordinator of the Group of Experts provided an overview of its final report to regional and other interested States and, on 15 September, the Coordinator presented the Group’s workplan for its current mandate to the Committee. He also noted that the Committee held three “informal informals” via video teleconference on 17 February, 11 April and 27 June with Richard Roy, former senior official of the mechanism assisting the Government in its investigations into the 2017 murders of two former members of the Group of Experts. The Committee also issued three press releases containing a brief summary of the informal consultations held on 13 May, 15 July and 27 September.
He went on to state that he will lead a delegation of Committee members in a visit to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda and Uganda on 7-18 November 2022. This visit aims to obtain first-hand accounts concerning the implementation of the sanctioning measures imposed by resolution 2360 (2017), as reaffirmed by resolution 2641 (2022). It will also provide an opportunity to hold consultations with the Governments of those States, MONUSCO and representatives of civil society and the business community working on issues relevant to the Committee’s mandate. He further noted that the notification requirements for the delivery of materiel to Congolese forces – except for five categories of weapons listed in an annex to resolution 2641 (2022) – were abolished with the adoption of that resolution on 30 June. He added that, during his upcoming visit, he will receive the views of various actors regarding possible sanctions designations for additional individuals and entities whose acts may be subject to the same.
EMERY MUDINGA, Director of the Angaza Institute, pointed out that the Democratic Republic of the Congo has the largest amount of tropical forest in the Congo Basin. However, recent studies estimate that such forested area is decreasing by 1 million hectares each year, which will destroy it by the end of the century if nothing is done. This will have consequences for food security and agricultural production, as well as for the global economy and the climate. Providing an overview of the primary threats to the Congolese forest, he pointed out that the same has turned into a “hidden headquarters” for hundreds of armed groups. Many are operating in the forests of the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where they are involved in various illegal exploitation activities. Further, their presence has led to the destruction of biodiversity and millions of lost tourism dollars. He also spotlighted multinational corporations taking land – sometimes with State blessing – and the irresponsible behaviour of some Congolese authorities who give logging permits to some companies.
Against that backdrop, he presented several suggested actions that the Council could take to respond to this problem. For example, the Council could act to enable the Democratic Republic of the Congo to field an army that can neutralize armed groups. It could also adopt sanctions against all Member States with proxy armed groups operating in the country. Further, it could finance projects and road infrastructure in forested areas to facilitate the monitoring of illicit activity and adopt sanctions to end the purchase and sale of wood by rebel groups and the Government. Financial and technical support for the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s forest policy and development projects would also be welcome, including by defining a specific policy to bring peace to forested areas. He added that, when renewing MONUSCO’s mandate, the Council could integrate into the same issues pertaining to climate change.
Statements
MARTIN KIMANI (Kenya), also speaking for Gabon and Ghana, welcomed President Felix Tshisekedi’s commitment to enhance trust between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and neighbouring countries through continued consultation to finalize regional security cooperation and economic partnership agreements, and Nairobi’s commitment to hold elections in 2023, in accordance with the Constitution. He commended the Independent National Electoral Commission’s comprehensive approach to planning and managing the electoral process and welcomed the electoral law revisions to ensure greater participation of all Congolese. Turning to the security situation, he expressed grave concern over the continuous activities of armed and terrorist affiliated groups, especially in the eastern part of the country, which disproportionally affect civilians, especially women and children. He, thus, reiterated the need for concerted effort to bring an end to these groups, and demanded the armed groups surrender their arms and engage with the Government under the Inter-Congolese Dialogue process.
He also expressed concern over the strained relations and hostilities between MONUSCO and the local populations. “Every effort must be made to rebuild trust and confidence between the mission and the host communities,” he added, beginning with MONUSCO prioritizing the protection of civilian; improved troop preparedness through capacity-building and training; and investing in base defenses and other force multipliers. Welcoming the 31 August communiqué adopted by the African Union Peace and Security Council endorsing the Nairobi and Luanda processes, he urged Member States to enhance support for these mechanisms and processes. Concerned that some priority benchmarks in the MONUSCO drawdown plan do not provide for its successful drawdown and exit, he backed the Congolese Government’s call for MONUSCO to review the joint transition plan and ensure that the benchmarks encompass, among others, strengthening key defense and security institutions as well as early warning initiatives and preventive interventions that mitigate relapse into conflict. Turning to the humanitarian crisis, he underscored the need to shift from short-term to long-term resilience-based humanitarian assistance.
FERGAL TOMAS MYTHEN (Ireland) expressed deep concern over the ongoing insecurity in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, which has exacerbated the humanitarian crisis and undermined aid organizations’ ability to deliver assistance to 27 million people. Noting the high rates of human rights violations, conflict-related sexual violence and gender-based violence perpetrated by armed groups and State actors, he condemned these acts and called for accountability. As his country awaits the outcome of the joint investigation into the Kasindi border incident, he expressed continued support for the role of MONUSCO in protecting civilians, and urged increased communication with communities and partners. Turning to the tensions between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, he welcomed the recent meetings between Presidents Tshisekedi Tshilombo and Kagame. Ireland urges the full inclusion of civil society, space for women’s full participation in efforts towards peace and constructive engagement with the ongoing Nairobi process. The East African Community regional force must progress in tandem with the political track, have clear objectives, cooperate and coordinate closely with MONUSCO and other actors, and comply fully with human rights standards and accountabilities. As disarmament, demobilization and reintegration are fundamental to lasting peace, he welcomed the support of the Multi-donor Stabilization Coherence Fund. Effective transitions are also key to sustaining peace. Recalling Ireland’s high-level event on implementing Council resolution 2594 (2021), he reiterated the need for inclusive, integrated transition planning. He also welcomed President Tshisekedi Tshilombo’s commitment to holding elections in 2023.
MONA JUUL (Norway) expressed concern over the recurrent and recently intensified resurgence of attacks by armed groups including the 23 March Movement (M23) and the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), as well as the rising tensions between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, calling on the countries to pursue a diplomatic solution. She welcomed efforts taken to address such security challenges, including the initiative by Angola’s President João Manuel Gonçalves Lourenço, and former Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta’s leadership of the Nairobi process, and echoed the Secretary-General’s call for close coordination between various actors, such as MONUSCO and the East African Regional Force once it deploys. Norway is deeply troubled by the deaths of United Nations personnel, which has contributed to protecting civilians under very challenging circumstances, during the recent violent protests against MONUSCO in North Kivu and the incident at the Kasindi border post in the country’s east that led to civilian casualties. The United Nations must establish the facts and ensure that those responsible are held accountable. On joint transition plan and the timeline for the drawdown, which are increasingly being questioned throughout the country, she said the transition must take into account the situation on the ground, in a gradual, responsible and sustainable way, and in line with the withdrawal plan. Calling for strengthening of the rule of law and security sector capacity, she underscored the importance of the upcoming December elections, for which Norway is providing financial support through the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
RICHARD M. MILLS, JR. (United States) stressed that without sufficient capabilities, MONUSCO will continue struggling to protect civilians from armed groups in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, calling on those armed groups to discontinue their assaults on the country’s most vulnerable populations. As M23 remains designated under the 1533 sanctions regime, Member States are required to freeze the armed group’s assets and ensure that no funds or economic resources are made available to it, he said. The East African community leaders and the Democratic Republic of the Congo officials must ensure that regional force does not disrupt the life-saving work of the country’s armed forces, MONUSCO and United Nations humanitarian agencies and non-governmental organizations. On safeguarding mission personnel and operations, he stressed: “Speaking out against anti-United Nations rhetoric, which has tragically led directly to the deaths of United Nations peacekeepers and civilians in recent months is critical in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and in all contexts where mis– and disinformation are undermining the ability of peacekeepers to carry out the mandates that the Council has given to them.” He urged the Government and Tanzanian authorities, in coordination with the United Nations, to complete a thorough investigation and hold perpetrators fully accountable. On the mission transition, he stressed that MONUSCO and the Democratic Republic of the Congo need the Council’s complete, unequivocal support.
JAMES KARIUKI (United Kingdom) expressed concern over the security situation in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, noting that the redeployment of resources to tackle M23 has undermined the protection of civilians and created a vacuum that armed groups have exploited. For its part, the United Kingdom has provided over 2.5 million people with humanitarian assistance since 2017, and he urged all actors to address the humanitarian impacts of this violence. He went on to condemn violent protests against MONUSCO — which undermine its ability to implement its mandate, including civilian protection — and called on the Mission and the Government to engage in a structured dialogue to clarify roles and responsibilities for a conditions-based drawdown of MONUSCO. A military solution alone cannot bring peace, however, and a credible, legitimate political process must be the foundation of any lasting settlement. To this end, diplomatic efforts and dialogue through existing regional processes should continue. He also called on MONUSCO to continue supporting the Government’s demobilization, disarmament, community recovery and stabilization programme. On the climate front, he added that his country has committed £200 million to the Congo Basin pledge and will chair the Central African Forest Initiative in 2023.
JUAN RAMÓN DE LA FUENTE RAMÍREZ (Mexico) expressed concern about the deteriorating security situation in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, and underscored the need to stymie the illicit flow of weapons to strip illicit armed groups of their capacity to destabilize the country. Strongly condemning violent activities targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure, and the recruitment of children by M23, CODECO and other armed groups, he said such violence further amplifies the number of internally displaced persons, which already number 5.5 million. All parties must guarantee that humanitarian actors can operate unhindered, as this is key to bringing about better governance and addressing the conflict’s structural causes. Expressing concern over the uptick in tensions between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, which impacts the region, he called for dialogue to resolve differences and welcomed the recent efforts of the President of France, as well as the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region, to address tensions and to help adhere to the road map laid out in the Luanda summit. He appealed for the deployment of the regional force under the Nairobi process to take place in coordination with MONUSCO and condemned the disinformation campaigns producing violent protests against MONUSCO, leading to the killing of peacekeeping personnel and civilians. Light must be shed on who is responsible for the attacks to ensure justice is done. Moreover, haste must be avoided in adjustments to the mandate of MONUSCO and its handover, in order to prioritize the protection of civilians and avoid exacerbating worrying trends in security and regional dynamics, he said, adding that national authorities must cooperate to ensure the protection of personnel.
RAVINDRA RAGUTTAHALLI (India) said that as one of the largest troop contributors to MONUSCO, his country is deeply concerned about the recent turn of events. The increasing activities of M23 and other armed groups, such as Allied Democratic Forces, CODECO, Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR) and Mai-Mai, call into question the overall approach to conflict resolution in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, he said, stressing that a political solution, not a military one, is key. The calls for a robust mandate for MONUSCO have fed into the ongoing disinformation campaign against the United Nations peacekeepers. Strongly condemning attacks against peacekeepers and expressing hope that the Congolese Government will bring perpetrators to justice, he commended the deployment of the East African Community joint regional force and underscored the importance of proactive and purposeful regional initiatives focused on development, demobilization of armed groups and mediation efforts to end hostilities. The success of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Community Reintegration and Stabilization Programme is crucial for the broader political process underway. He went on to welcome progress made towards laying the ground for the upcoming elections in 2023, expressing hope that political actors will work towards building consensus and increasing the meaningful participation of Congolese women in the country’s political and peace processes. Noting that the closure of MONUSCO field offices in Tanganyika in June “went as planned”, he emphasized that the transition and eventual exit of the mission must be gradual, responsible and orderly.
AMEIRAH ALHEFEITI (United Arab Emirates), echoing the repeated calls of the East African Community, Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) and other regional actors, stressed the need for de-escalation and the cessation of hostilities and violence in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The activities of armed groups, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, as well as intercommunal tensions, strain the capabilities of national forces and MONUSCO, undermine security and prevent sustainable peace. “It is regrettable that, in every meeting we hold on this matter, we must extend our condolences to the families of victims of new attacks in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo,” she noted. Spotlighting the alarming escalation in violence against women and girls, she reiterated the need to ensure that such crimes continue to be reported, that perpetrators are held accountable and that women and girls are provided with adequate protection and support. As establishing security in the Democratic Republic of the Congo requires political dialogue at the national and regional levels, she recognized the role of the Luanda road map and Nairobi process in creating space for regional leaders to coordinate efforts and strengthen cooperation. The Council, she continued, plays an important role by sustaining support for confidence-building measures among regional actors. The preservation of gains requires constructive engagement by all stakeholders in the gradual drawdown and eventual withdrawal of MONUSCO. She further noted the impact of the deteriorating humanitarian situation on the new academic year, and called for the alleviation of suffering for displaced people, education access for children and protection from attacks for humanitarian workers and civilian infrastructure.
ALBANA DAUTLLARI (Albania) welcomed the ongoing progress in preparing the groundwork for holding elections in 2023, calling on all parties to work together to foster conditions to make them inclusive, free, transparent and acceptable to all parties. While welcoming the commitment of national and regional actors to defuse tensions, she noted that the security situation on the ground remains of great concern. Given the complex situation, harmonious implementation of the proposed coordination mechanism between the Luanda Roadmap and the Nairobi process is key. Moreover, the obligations of the East African Regional Force should be implemented in full coordination and cooperation with MONUSCO, to ensure protection of civilians and maintain humanitarian access. She welcomed the meeting between the Presidents of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda to ensure the withdrawal of M23 from all occupied territories and the return of war-displaced persons. She went on to express alarm about the plight of civilians, noting the continued dire number of victims of extrajudicial and summary killings, the grave violations and recruitment of children or cases of conflict-related sexual violence despite the decrease in documented abuses and violations in Ituri and North Kivu. She called on armed groups to lay down their weapons unconditionally and for the return of foreign armed groups to their country of origin. The proposed review of MONUSCO’s withdrawal plan must be conducted in a way that will guarantee minimum-security conditions for the Mission’s staff, and a conditions-based exit from provinces where it operates.
JOÃO GENÉSIO DE ALMEIDA FILHO (Brazil), noting that the overall security and humanitarian situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo remains dire with 1.29 million people newly displaced since January and almost 27 million people needing assistance and protection, said the 2022 humanitarian response plan has only received a fraction of the required amount. Pointing to the revised electoral law and announcement of the voter registration period by the Independent National Electoral Commission as “important steps” in implementing the electoral calendar, he welcomed the commitments of the Congolese Government, Parliament and Electoral Commission to hold elections in 2023 and emphasized that concerns of the opposition and civil society must be taken into account. The adoption of the concept of operations for the new East African Community Regional Force and its status–of–forces agreement earlier this month shows how determined the region’s countries are to address the security situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, he said, also welcoming the recent arrival of Burundian and Kenyan troops. While underlining support for peaceful protest, he condemned violence and intimidation, including against United Nations personnel, calling for those responsible to be held accountable and voicing concern about reports that some Congolese authorities may have encouraged protests against MONUSCO. MONUSCO’s strategic communication capabilities must be enhanced in the face of disinformation campaigns to ensure the Mission can implement its mandate. The current state of domestic politics and renewed regional efforts bode well for implementing MONUSCO’s transition plan, he concluded.
ANNA M. EVSTIGNEEVA (Russian Federation), said that despite a “degree of calm” and absence of large-scale hostilities between the M23 and Government forces, numerous illegal armed formations are fighting among themselves for natural resources and using the revenue from their illegal exploitation to finance illicit activities of armed groups in the east of the country. She strongly condemned the deadly attacks on MONUSCO facilities in the North Kivu province in July. Stressing the need to deal with these issues through non-violence, she called for significantly more coordination and exchange of information between MONUSCO and official Congolese structures. Consistent responsible action is needed to implement the joint transition plan and to gradually reduce MONUSCO’s size by 2024, taking into consideration the evolving situation on the ground. She underscored the “top priority” of resolving the situation by political means, including through constructive cooperation among regional players, commending the launching of new conflict resolution mechanisms in the Great Lakes region. In this vein, she commended the peacekeeping efforts of Angola’s President and underscored that the Russian Federation is monitoring the Nairobi process. She welcomed the important decisions by regional States, including the establishment of a joint regional force during consultations in Nairobi, and emphasized the importance of their implementation with the support of the international community and in direct coordination with MONUSCO and by the leading role played by Kinshasa.
Dai Bing (China), stressing that restoring stability is the top priority, urged all armed groups to respond immediately to the Nairobi process, cease violence and participate unconditionally in political dialogue, reconciliation, disarmament, demobilization and reintegration. China welcomed the recent electoral law and voter registration progress and called on all parties to create a favourable atmosphere for general elections. He called for continued support in resolving “African issues in African ways”. The international community must support the Nairobi and Luanda processes and regional countries to resolve differences. Central to these efforts is the effective performance of MONUSCO, he said, and urged the Mission to continue communication with all to enhance mutual understanding and trust. In line with its presidential statement in August on capacity-building for peace in Africa, the Security Council should streamline and optimize MONUSCO’s tasks, curb mandates beyond its abilities and devote resources to core tasks such as the protection of civilians and maintenance of security and stability. He urged a timely investigation of the recent deadly incident between peacekeepers and civilians. He then voiced support for strengthening MONUSCO’s coordination with authorities on its drawdown. MONUSCO must respect the concerns of host countries and implement a plan in a steady, orderly and responsible manner in accordance with the situation on the ground and exit benchmarks, he emphasized. Turning to the Government’s repeated requests to lift the arms embargo, he urged the Council to respond positively.
NICOLAS DE RIVIÈRE (France), Council President for September, speaking in his national capacity, said that at the initiative of French President Emmanuel Macron, the Presidents of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda met last week in New York and agreed to work together to obtain the withdrawal of the M23 from the occupied areas as soon as possible. Also, commitments to bring an end to the actions of all armed groups in the region were taken. MONUSCO must regain its freedom of action to protect civilians, he stressed, pointing out that it is up to the Congolese authorities to ensure the security of the United Nations and to fight against misinformation. The status-of-forces agreement must be respected, and the Mission’s freedom of movement restored. Ultimately, MONUSCO’s gradual and responsible withdrawal will depend on the achievement of benchmarks established in the joint transition plan. Until then, MONUSCO must continue to implement its civilian protection mandate, he said, affirming France’s support in that regard. If requested by the national authorities, the European Union has the means to help the country prepare for those elections. In the meantime, efforts must continue to consolidate stability and development. This includes the response to the humanitarian emergency, the protection of human rights, and the fight against hate speech. The sustainable exploitation of natural resources and the fight against illicit trafficking thereof will be additional factors for peace.
GEORGES NZONGOLA-NTALAJA (Democratic Republic of the Congo), emphasizing that his country needs peace to forge on the path of development, called for the withdrawal of occupying forces from the east, particularly the M23 supported by Rwanda. “The Council has its own Group of Experts but it cannot stand by with eyes closed, and must clearly join us in asking the occupying forces to leave Bunagana without conditions or ruses,” he said. Turning to the report under consideration on the situation in his country, he expressed deep appreciation for the work of MONUSCO’s troops and the quick reaction force among others for their continued sacrifices in the name of peace. Turning to the Nairobi process, he noted that the political track is underway, with respect to the incorporation of rebel groups into the Demobilization, Disarmament, Community Recovery and Stabilization Programme, however the comprehensive operationalization of this crucial process requires funding. On the military track, there is a need to tackle defiant negative elements such M23, CODECO in Ituri and the Mai-Mai in South Kivu, he said, adding: “No discussion is possible regarding foreign armed groups; they must lay down their arms and go home.” He called on the countries of origin of these negative elements to implement the process to reabsorb these fighters, stressing: “The DRC is not a drain.”
On the pursuit of joint operations between FARDC, MONUSCO, and the regional force, he assured the Council that his country’s forces will work in full harmony with MONUSCO, pointing to the joint command of the regional force and FARDC in the form of General Kaputu. Information sharing and coordination will be encouraged to avoid “friendly shots”, he added. Turning to the political situation, notably mediation initiatives and the upcoming electoral process, he stated that a revised electoral law was adopted on 29 June, and that an electoral calendar will shortly be published by the country’s independent national election commission. On mediation initiatives, while efforts in Kenya, Angola and by the French president are commendable, Bungana is still under attack. Addressing anti-MONUSCO sentiments, he said his country is working to calm the population; however, such efforts must not be undone by demoralizing rhetoric in parallel. There is a need to reevaluate the plan for MONUSCO’s drawdown, he went on, stressing the need to protect civilians, and for sufficient means to purchase equipment. In this regard, he called for the estimated 67 per cent funding gap to be plugged.
He went on to call on the Council to support the inviolability of Democratic Republic of the Congo’s borders, and the immediate withdrawal of forces from Bunagana; to examine in a clear-sighted fashion the statements made on the United Nations rostrum by the Group of Experts on the attack on his country; to condemn the criminal attacks of M23 and all those who support it; to lend support for the Nairobi process; to ensure all forces lay down arms and support the demobilization, disarmament, community recovery and stabilization process; for sanctions to be stepped up against groups exploiting his country’s natural resources, including multinationals profiting from such exploitation; and for the total – not partial – lifting of prior notification clause with respect to sanctions, which is not useful and does not allow his country to defend itself.
CLAVER GATETE (Rwanda) noted that the East African Community’s regional force is being deployed to implement the Nairobi process, which provides solid ground for ending the presence of armed groups in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, he underscored that FDLR and its splinter groups continue to pose a serious threat to Rwanda, and that concerns arise when such groups receive support from, and operate alongside, the armed forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Such treatment allows these negative forces to organize, recruit and conduct cross-border incursions into Rwandan territory, and the armed forces must stop forging alliances with sanctioned groups.
Recalling “entirely preventable” attacks by the FDLR, he stressed that the same and its splinter groups present a credible threat to Rwandan security and that “assertions to the contrary are disingenuous”. Further, some Congolese leaders’ tendency to scapegoat Rwanda for political attention only serves to deepen anti-Rwandan sentiment. If this hate speech continues, it will exacerbate the problems in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and further divide the country by deepening hatred and mistrust among Congolese communities. Adding that blaming others for that country’s internal failures is problematic, he called on the Government to accept its obligations and implement existing, signed peace agreements.
ZÉPHYRIN MANIRATANGA (Burundi) said his country welcomed with “dignity and warmth” thousands of refugees from eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo and joined efforts with the East African Community aiming to stabilize that region within the framework of the Nairobi process by deploying a contingent of the national defence force to the area. Noting recurrent security problems, he expressed support for regional approaches, particularly the Nairobi process, which aimed to remedy the security situation and to bring peace between the armed forces and Government on one hand, and between the warring local communities on the other. Encouraged by the determination of some regional leaders to step up political and military efforts to bring about peace and lasting stability, he called for the United Nations multidimensional support for the Nairobi process. He expressed assurance that Burundi, as a rotating chair of the East African Community, will do everything in its power to actively participate in all United Nations and African initiatives aimed at restoring peace and international security. He underscored that a solution not only lays in neutralizing the armed forces, but also in developing an approach designed to reconcile local communities and install a culture of peace. For that purpose, Burundi is now preparing to draw on its experience, tools and means to ensure peaceful coexistence of all communities living in the east of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Source: United Nations

Security Council Fails to Adopt Resolution Condemning Moscow’s Referenda in Ukraine’s Occupied Territories, as Permanent Member Employs Veto

Representative Calls 15-Member Organ ‘Broken Pillar’ of United Nations
Meeting today following Russian Federation President Vladimir V. Putin’s proclamation of Moscow’s annexation of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the Security Council rejected a draft resolution intended to condemn the referenda that preceded it.
The draft, submitted by Albania and the United States, garnered support from 10 members but was vetoed by the Russian Federation. Brazil, China, Gabon and India all abstained.
Through the draft resolution, the 15-member Council would have also declared that the referenda taken on 23 to 27 September in parts of those regions are neither valid nor form the basis for any alteration of the status of these regions of Ukraine, including any purported annexation by the Russian Federation.
The draft would also have the Council call on all States, international organizations and specialized agencies not to recognize any alteration of the status of these Ukrainian regions, nor any purported acquisition thereof by the Russian Federation.
By other terms, the Council would have decided that the Russian Federation shall desist and refrain from actions aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine in all areas within that country’s internationally recognized borders.
Further, the organ would have decided that the Russian Federation shall immediately cease its full-scale, unlawful invasion of Ukraine and immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all its military forces from the territory of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders to enable a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
Speaking before the vote, the representative of the United States recalled that some people have said that the process leading to this draft resolution was rushed, but stressed that “what was rushed was Russia’s illegal act to annex Ukraine’s territory”. Underscoring that this issue is about collective security, she urged other Council members to vote in favour of the resolution in defence of international peace and security.
The representative of the Russian Federation, however, said that the Council has never adopted resolutions that directly condemn one of its members, adding that other Council members are pushing his delegation to use its veto so they can wax lyrical that the Russian Federation is abusing that right. “The results of the [referenda] speak for themselves — the residents of these regions do not want to return to Ukraine,” he said, emphasizing that the referenda were carried out in full conformity with international law.
Following the vote, Albania’s representative said that the Council was taken hostage by the Russian Federation’s misuse of its veto. Isolated in its actions and its positions, that country never wanted peace or dialogue, she stressed, underscoring that it only wanted the territory of Ukraine.
Urging both sides to work towards the immediate cessation of hostilities, the representative of India said that, as an escalation of rhetoric and tension is in no one’s interest, her country abstained on the draft resolution. China’s delegation also abstained, with that country’s representative stating that sanctions and political isolation will not bring peace and will only worsen the situation.
Brazil’s delegate stated that the text’s scope and language do not contribute to resolving the conflict, and Gabon’s representative called for good faith negotiations and dialogue to end the fighting and promote peaceful coexistence.
Ukraine’s representative then described the Council as a broken pillar of the United Nations, noting that other parts of the Organization are resolved to step in and exercise their potential. Ukraine has every right to liberate its territories and will continue to do so, he underscored, and he characterized the Russian Federation’s presence on the Council as a cancerous tumour that should be removed before it metastasizes. “If the Council cannot act with Russia, it is its duty to act without it,” he stressed.
Also speaking today were representatives of the United Kingdom, Norway, Ireland, Ghana, Mexico, Kenya, United Arab Emirates and France.
The meeting began at 3:02 p.m. and ended at 4:04 p.m.
Statements before Vote
LINDA THOMAS-GREENFIELD (United States) said that the draft resolution that her country and Albania have put before the Security Council condemns the illegal so-called “referenda” held in Ukrainian territory, calls on all States not to recognize any alteration of Ukraine and requires that the Russian Federation withdraw its troops from that country immediately. Some people have said that the process leading to this draft resolution was rushed, but “what was rushed was Russia’s illegal act to annex Ukraine’s territory”. The Council must respond, as a Member State — one that is a Council member — is attempting to annex another Member State by force. The outcome of the sham referendums was predetermined in Moscow “and everyone knows it”. However, the Ukrainian people have demonstrated loud and clear that they will never accept subjugation to Russian rule, nor will the United States recognize the territory that the Russian Federation seeks to seize as anything other than part of Ukraine.
Everyone has an interest in defending the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity, she said, adding that everyone understands the implications if these principles are tossed aside. This issue is bigger than any one nation; it is about collective security. The Council is the first line of defence for the Charter of the United Nations, and it must demonstrate that it can work despite the actions of one permanent member. “This is not a moment to stand on the sidelines,” she said. If the Russian Federation chooses to shield itself from accountability, then the United States will take further steps in the General Assembly to send Moscow an unmistakeable message that the world is still on the side of defending sovereignty and protecting territorial integrity. Recalling that the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, was seen celebrating this clear violation of international law earlier today, she said that the United States will vote in favour of the draft resolution, and urged other Council members to do likewise in defence of international peace and security.
BARBARA WOODWARD (United Kingdom) said that the Russian Federation’s annexations jeopardize prospects for peace and undermine the purpose and principles of the United Nations. Encompassing 90,000 square kilometres, they constitute the largest forcible annexation of territories since the Second World War. “There is no middle ground on this,” she said, adding that this is a simple question of principle, as the Secretary-General has stated. “As members of the Security Council, with a responsibility to maintain international peace and security, and to uphold the United Nations Charter, we must condemn Russia’s actions and vote in favour of the resolution,” she said.
VASSILY A. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation) said the Council has never adopted resolutions which directly condemn one of its members. “Do you seriously expect Russia to consider and support such a draft?,” he said, adding that other Council members are pushing his delegation to use its veto, thus enabling them to wax lyrical that the Russian Federation is abusing that right. Referring to the recent referendums, he said that an overwhelming majority in Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson supported their integration into the Russian Federation, despite the provocations of the Kyiv regime. The vote turnout ranged from 76 per cent in the Kherson region to 97 per cent in the Donetsk People’s Republic. “The results of the referendums speak for themselves — the residents of these regions do not want to return to Ukraine,” he said, emphasizing that the referendums were carried out in full conformity with international law.
Turning to the draft resolution, he said that the Council had an opportunity to adopt a truly balanced and useful document, as the Russian Federation had constructively proposed amendments regarding the territorial integrity of Member States and the principle of self-determination of peoples. Council members may assess the outcome of referendums differently, but who can argue with the fact that a free expression of the will of people is an essential element of a democratic society, he wondered. On referring the matter to the General Assembly, he hoped that Member States would form their own unbiased views of the situation and make the right choice.
Action
The Council then rejected the text by a vote of 10 in favour to 1 against (Russian Federation), with 4 abstentions (Brazil, China, Gabon, India), owing to the negative vote of a permanent member of the Council.
Statements after Vote
ALBANA DAUTLLARI (Albania) said the Council was taken hostage and prevented from acting by the Russian Federation’s misuse of its veto. The proposed text concerned the fundamental issues and principles binding Member States in the United Nations, including the preservation of territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence. Isolated in its actions and its positions, the Russian Federation never wanted peace or dialogue. Rather, it only wanted the territory of Ukraine. All States and international organizations must not recognize its acquisition of Ukrainian territory and must refrain from any action that could be interpreted as recognition. By firmly condemning such unacceptable behaviour and standing in defence and support of Ukraine, Member States are defending the rules-based international order, she said, vowing to continue the fight in the General Assembly.
MONA JUUL (Norway) said that her delegation voted in favour of the resolution, as the Council has the responsibility to prevent acts of aggression and breaches of territorial integrity. Expressing regret that the resolution was not adopted because of a single member’s veto, she said that it was wrong that the Russian Federation, an invading force, could prevent Council action aimed at ending its aggression. Whatever was announced in Moscow today is contrary to international law, has no legal effect and in no way changes Ukraine’s sovereignty within its internationally recognized borders. The Russian Federation, as a permanent Council member, has a clear responsibility to respect the Charter of the United Nations, but its actions relating to Ukraine go against everything for which the United Nations stands. The Russian Federation is isolating itself from the global community, rejecting international law and ignoring the global consequences of its actions, she said, adding that it is “unacceptable” that the Council has once again been blocked from acting. The General Assembly, however, will have the opportunity to take up this grave and important issue, she said.
GENG SHUANG (China), stating that China abstained from the vote, said his country’s position is consistent and clear: sovereignty and territorial integrity must be safeguarded, and all parties’ legitimate security concerns must be taken seriously. Seven months on, the crisis has had considerable negative impacts. He expressed concern about the prospect of a long and protracted crisis and called for efforts to be made to de-escalate tensions and restart diplomatic negotiations. All viable options must be put on the table to achieve an early ceasefire and any action by the Council should aim to ease the situation rather than exacerbate confrontation. Sanctions and political isolation will not bring peace and will only worsen the situation, making it intractable, he said, adding that China will continue to play a constructive role to resolve the crisis.
Ms. WOODWARD (United Kingdom) said that the Russian Federation is using its veto to defend its illegal actions. Council members voted in different ways, but not a single other member recognized the illegal annexation of Ukrainian territory. “Russia’s veto does not change that fact,” she said, adding that the announced accession of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions into the Russian Federation is a “fantasy” that has no legal effect. The sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine is under attack and “the international system is being assaulted in front of our eyes”. The Russian Federation will not succeed in its actions, she said, expressing concern about how much damage will be done and how many lives will be wasted before Moscow comes to this realization.
FERGAL MYTHEN (Ireland) said Ireland voted in favour out of its belief that the Council must have a robust response to the Russian Federation’s blatant breach of the Charter of the United Nations in its war of aggression. He reiterated Ireland’s full commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders. Recalling his earlier condemnation of the sham referenda in Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, he categorically rejected the so-called results and announcements to annex Ukrainian territory. They have no legal effect and are nothing more than a blatant land-grab by the Russian Federation. He described that country’s use of its Council veto as shameful, reprehensible and an attempt to excuse its military action. Going forward, the international community will not be deterred from holding the Russian Federation accountable, he said, calling for the Council to submit a special report on the use of the veto in accordance with General Assembly resolution 76/262 (2021).
CAROLYN ABENA ANIMA OPPONG-NTIRI (Ghana), noting that her delegation voted in favour of the text, expressed regret at the “unsurprising outcome” of the vote. Once again, the offending State’s use of its veto stood in the way of the Council’s ability to exercise its mandate. The Russian Federation’s annexation of occupied territories within Ukraine’s internationally recognized borders is illegal and constitutes a serious violation of that country’s sovereignty, she said, adding that it has no legal effect. She called on the Russian Federation to end its aggression against Ukraine, to refrain from further escalatory actions and to embrace a new chapter of peace.
JUAN RAMÓN DE LA FUENTE RAMÍREZ (Mexico), recalling that his country has lost territory through annexation following invasion, underscored that it cannot consent to another State also suffering this type of aggression under any circumstances. Mexico’s position has remained clear in its unwavering respect for international law, especially the prohibition of territorial expansion through force. Pointing out that the referendums held in the occupied territory of Ukraine in the context of armed conflict lack any validity under international law, he said that Mexico supports Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders. Further, he supported efforts by the Secretary-General and other actors to promote dialogue and diplomacy to find political means with which to end the war. He added that Mexico voted in favour of today’s resolution.
RONALDO COSTA FILHO (Brazil) said his country abstained from the vote. Affirming the territorial integrity of all States, he said that the actions that took place around the annexation of territories cannot be perceived as legitimate. While welcoming efforts to amend the text to make it more focused and streamlined, he said that its scope and language do not contribute to resolving the conflict. Rather, the draft reflected the dynamics seen in the Council over the past month, when its members failed to agree on any constructive action. The text also did not contribute to the immediate goals of de-escalating tensions and starting peace negotiations. He urged the Council to explore new courses of action, emphasizing that a refusal to consider alternatives will do nothing to bring about a political solution to the conflict.
MARTIN KIMANI (Kenya) said that since the start of the war in Ukraine, Kenya has consistently called for a cessation of hostilities to allow for dialogue. “Whether this is established now or following a protracted war that can escalate to an extreme danger of international peace and security, a negotiation is inevitable,” he said. Kenya voted in favour of the resolution based on its principled defence of the Charter and the principle of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all Member States. He urged Council members to do more to find a path towards dialogue and diplomacy, rather than turning the Council into an arena for the continuation of conflict by diplomatic means. He concluded by reaffirming Kenya’s recognition of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders.
LANA ZAKI NUSSEIBEH (United Arab Emirates) said that territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence are central to peaceful, cooperative and productive relations between States. Those same principles also protect States and ensure the security and stability of all. Self-determination is also a fundamental principle, but tensions need not amount to a zero-sum game. She added that recent developments warranted a clear statement from the Council. Her delegation voted in favour of the text, even though it would have liked more time to engage on substance and edits. She called for all sides to stop escalating and to instead help create the conditions for peace. She also urged the Russian Federation and Ukraine to return to the negotiating table quickly and without preconditions.
PARFAIT ONANGA-ANYANGA (Gabon) said that his country voted to abstain. He underscored Gabon’s clear position against war and its support for a diplomatic solution. He called for a cessation of hostilities and good-faith negotiations and dialogue to end the fighting and promote peaceful coexistence. He also reiterated his country’s support for all initiatives geared towards a peaceful resolution.
NICOLAS DE RIVIÈRE (France), Council President for September, spoke in his national capacity to condemn the Russian Federation’s annexation of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Noting that his delegation voted in favour of the resolution, he underscored that these regions — like Crimea — are integral parts of Ukraine. As such, France will never recognize these illegal annexations, nor the results of the fake referenda that preceded them, as they constitute a flagrant violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Welcoming the spirit of compromise reflected in the approach by the United States and Albania to the resolution, he condemned the Russian Federation’s veto of the same, which, once again, shows its irresponsibility in carrying out its duties as a permanent Council member. The Russian Federation stands alone, more than ever, but it is regrettable that the Council was unable to take a unanimous stance to defend the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity — pillars of international law. Underscoring that Ukraine is fighting in its legitimate defence, he stated that France will continue to support that country in countering Russian aggression and recovering full sovereignty over its territory.
SERGIY KYSLYTSYA (Ukraine) said that the occupant of the permanent seat of the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation, with its lonely hand raised against the resolution, testified to its isolation and its desperate attempts to deny reality, as well as the Charter of the United Nations. “Putin’s envoy has followed in the footsteps of his master, who just put on a puppet show to deny the reality that his aggressive regime is heading to its imminent defeat.” Putin has grabbed territories that he does not physically control, he said, adding that Ukraine’s forces continue to liberate its sovereign territories. Thirty civilians were killed and 88 wounded during the Russian shelling of Zaporizhzhia earlier in the day, he said, adding that the only way to make all Ukrainians feel safe is to hoist Ukrainian flags back through occupied Donbas, southern Ukraine and Crimea. Ukraine has every right to liberate its territories and will continue to do so.
The Russian Federation’s actions in the Council prevents that organ from executing its duty to maintain international peace and security, he said, adding that millions around the world are witnessing the Council’s failure to respond to a global threat. Describing the Council as a broken pillar of the United Nations, he said that other parts of the Organization are resolved to step in and exercise their potential. He quoted the Secretary-General’s clear position on recent events, which he called a “dangerous escalation with no place in the modern world”, and called into question Moscow’s “illegal occupation of the Soviet seat in the Council”. He went on to characterize the Russian Federation’s presence on the Council as a cancerous tumor that should be removed before it metastasizes, stressing: “If the Council cannot act with Russia, it is its duty to act without it.”

Source: United Nations

Warning of Its Planet-Warming Impact, Senior Economic, Social Affairs Official Urges Global Action to Address Nord Stream Pipelines’ Leaks, in Security Council Briefing

United States, Russian Federation Delegates Trade Barbs, Deny Responsibility, as Council Members Call for Investigation of Incident
The international community must take steps to address the consequences of the recent leaks in the Nord Stream pipelines, while its causes are being investigated, Navid Hanif, Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development at the Department of Economic and Social Affairs, told the Security Council today, in a meeting requested by the Russian Federation to discuss the incidents.
Noting that the leaks led to the release of an unknown quantity of methane, Mr. Hanif pointed out that the gas has more than 80 times the planet-warming potency of carbon dioxide over a 20-year time frame and underscored the need to accelerate the transition to a clean and resilient energy system.
Sergey Kupriyanov, Spokesperson for Gazprom, also addressing the Council, called the leaks “absolutely unprecedented”, and stated that existing data pointed to physical damage to the pipeline as the cause of the incidents. Noting that the pipelines have been designed to deliver 110 billion cubic metres of gas per year, representing a quarter of Europe’s gas consumption in the European Union, he said steps are being taken to make the system operational once more, as they had resulted in Europe’s being “indefinitely deprived of a key route for the delivery of a crucial energy resource”.
His remarks were followed by those of Marc-Antoine Eyl-Mazzega, Director of the Center for Energy and Climate, French Institute on Foreign Relations, who noted that the explosions, which did not proceed from an accident, represented yet another episode in the long-lasting geopolitical confrontation between the United States and the Russian Federation on one hand, and between the latter and Europe on the other hand, where energy and pipeline infrastructure has been weaponized. The massive methane leak in the aftermath of the incident is dangerous, he said, voicing regret that the Russian Federation has not signed on to the Global Methane Pledge. Further, the targeting of energy infrastructure by sophisticated sabotage “should be a concern for Europe and the rest of the world”, he said.
In the ensuing discussion, many Council members expressed concern about the impacts of the leaks on the environment and on energy markets, with some pointing out that such disruptions would have a disproportionate impact on developing countries. Several members called for the incidents to be investigated while avoiding an escalation in already fraught geopolitical tensions. Meanwhile, the representatives of the Russian Federation and the United States exchanged barbs, with the former implying the involvement of the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the leaks, while the latter denied his country’s involvement in the incidents, despite the former’s “inflammatory rhetoric” and its use of the Council as a platform to spread disinformation.
The representative of the Russian Federation said his country had initiated a criminal proceeding under the act of international terrorism following the sabotage of the three Nord Stream pipelines, asserting that the complexity and scale of such acts were beyond the power of ordinary terrorists, and had to have been caused by State- or State-controlled actors. Recalling that United States President Joseph R. Biden had said that, if the Russian Federation were to invade, there would no longer be a Nord Stream 2, he asked the United States representative if he could confirm that his country was not involved in the sabotage of Nord Stream pipelines. Pointing out that the damage to the pipelines would leave Europe dependent on a more expensive, unreliable supplier — the United States — he said that country’s liquified gas suppliers should now be celebrating the rupture of the European Union’s energy independence. In a second intervention, he went on to state that it made no sense for his country to destroy a project it had so heavily invested in.
For his part, the representative of the United States expressed support for ongoing European investigative efforts into the leaks, stating that “the search for the truth cannot be rushed”. He then observed that the Russian Federation’s delegation “had a bad day”, as they had to watch that “strangely odd, fascist, Nuremberg-style rally-combined-with-a-Las-Vegas-1970s-show that happened in Moscow this morning to celebrate the illegal annexation of Ukrainian territory”, followed by the Council’s sending a message about that annexation in the afternoon, adding that none of it justified the Russian Federation’s repeated presentation of disinformation and conspiracy theories in the Council. Taking the floor a second time, following the second intervention of his Russian Federation counterpart, he underscored his previous assertion, supported by an observation made by one of the briefers, that Europe’s energy situation is affected more by the Russian Federation’s unreliability as an energy supplier than anything to do with the United States.
The representative of China, pointing out that the leakage is still going on, characterized the incident as a “great calamity” that China “does not wish to see”. He called for an impartial investigation of the incident, which seemed to have resulted from sabotage, thereby constituting an attack on transnational civilian facilities and submarine pipelines in violation of international law.
Meanwhile, the representative of France, Council President for September, speaking in his national capacity, expressed solidarity with Denmark and Sweden following the unprecedented events that impact them from a security and environmental standpoint, and emphasized that the available information indicated that the leaks were the consequence of a deliberate act of sabotage, with two seismic events recorded before the leaks occurred: measurements indicated explosions equivalent to 500 kilogrammes of trinitrotoluene. Expressing support for investigations to be carried out by countries concerned, he went on to denounce the hostile attack on Europe’s energy infrastructure.
Also speaking were representatives of Norway, Mexico, Ireland, Gabon, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, Albania, Kenya, India, Brazil and Ghana.
The meeting began at 4:11 p.m. and ended at 5:26 p.m.
Briefings
NAVID HANIF, Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development at the Department of Economic and Social Affairs, briefing the Council on the recent leaks in the Nord Stream pipelines, said that all the information he is presenting today is from publicly available sources. The United Nations is not able to verify or confirm any reported details relating to these incidents, he noted, but reported that, over the course of 26 to 29 September, four leaks were detected in the Nord Stream submarine pipelines in the Baltic Sea. The first was reported on Nord Stream 1 on the morning of 26 September when seismologists detected a spike in activity. The second and third were reported on Nord Stream 1 that evening, and the fourth, on Nord Stream 2, on the morning of 29 September. He pointed out that neither pipeline was in operation, as supplies in Nord Stream 1 were halted in September and Nord Stream 2 never came into operation. However, both contained natural gas, and were reported to have held several hundreds of millions of cubic metres of natural gas at the time of the incidents. He went on to say that site inspections have yet to be done, and therefore, the details of exactly what happened remain unknown.
He stressed, however, that, while the causes of the incidents are being investigated, the international community must address the consequences of these leaks. Damage to the pipelines raises concerns regarding uncertainty in global energy markets, and could exacerbate high price volatility in those markets in Europe and around the world. He also expressed concern over the potential environmental impact of the leaks, which discharged hundreds of millions of cubic metres of gas into the atmosphere. Pointing out that methane has more than 80 times the planet-warming potency of carbon dioxide over a 20-year time frame, he said that it is unknown how much methane was released. Regardless, these incidents highlight the vulnerability of critical energy infrastructure, along with the importance of accelerating the transition to a clean, resilient and sustainable energy system while ensuring universal access to affordable, reliable energy. He added that any attack on critical civilian infrastructure is unacceptable, urging that these incidents not be allowed to further increase tensions or deepen divisions in an already-tense regional context.
SERGEY KUPRIYANOV, Spokesperson for Gazprom, recalled the events occurring on 26 September, when, within a single day, three lines of the Nord Stream gas pipeline system broke in the Baltic Sea. Noting that they are offshore gas pipelines with a length of about 1,200 kilometres each, he stated that they were created for reliable, direct supplies of Russian gas to Europe, with a design capacity constituting a total of 110 billion cubic metres of gas per year, representing a quarter of gas consumption in the European Union. “This is energy for 52 million European households,” he stated, pointing out that half a trillion cubic metres of Russian gas have been supplied to European consumers via the Nord Stream gas pipeline since 2011.
The data regarding the pressure drops in sections of the pipeline, as well as leaks in sites in its German and Denmark sections, make it possible to say that they were caused by physical damage to the pipeline, which are modern, high-tech and have experienced many years of safe operation, he went on. Gazprom is now searching for possible solutions to make the system operational once again, he said, adding that that, overall, a situation where three leaks in three pipelines in one day is “absolutely unprecedented”, leading to Europe being “indefinitely deprived of a key route for the delivery of a crucial energy resource”. The Russian Federation and Gazprom have expended a huge amount of funds and efforts to ensure the safe delivery of Russian gas to European consumers. The pipelines remain currently ruptured.
MARC-ANTOINE EYL-MAZZEGA, Director of the Center for Energy and Climate, French Institute on Foreign Relations, concurred with Mr. Kurpiyanov’s assessment, noting that the Nord Stream 1 and 2 corridors were designed with state-of-the-art technology with a view to reducing the risk of any damage from, among others, storms, Second World War non-exploded bombs or sinking ships. “These are great pipelines, so to my best knowledge, an accident can be ruled out,” he said. Providing context to the events, he said the explosions are another episode in the long-lasting geopolitical confrontation between the United States and the Russian Federation on one hand, and between the latter and Europe on the other hand, where energy and pipeline infrastructure has taken centre stage and has been weaponized. He noted that, in June 2021, Gazprom unusually started to reduce gas exports to European markets, while respecting contractual obligations. This pushed gas prices up and led to a slow increase in imports of liquefied natural gas to compensate. By the fall of 2021, the opening of the pipeline was pending completion of the certification procedure to ensure it complied with European Union law.
The Russian Federation’s aggression in Ukraine in February aggravated gas supply tensions, he said, adding that, at end of February, Germany stopped the certification procedure for Nord Stream 2 indefinitely. In the following months, using various pretexts and reasons, Gazprom started to progressively cut off most of its customers, but this time in key disregard of long-term contracts, he said. This summer, Gazprom further reduced export volumes to Nord Stream, blaming Western sanctions on equipment. This extraordinary pipeline infrastructure had been shut down for many days and weeks, he pointed out. Europe and many countries around the world have been severely impacted by Gazprom’s market behavior. In Europe, soaring prices are posing burdens on consumers’ utilities and public finances, while Gazprom has made huge profits. In the rest of the world, many large importers are deprived of access to energy because they cannot afford to pay.
Many countries and companies have turned to dirty fuel, such as heavy oil or coal, causing large and lasting environmental damage, he said. Just before pipeline explosions, Gazprom contractual relations, in an unprecedented move, put most of its European customers in “full tatters” and flows to the pipelines had been stopped for several weeks already. Against that backdrop the relevance and value of the Nord Stream corridors to the Russian Federation has declined. “Financially, this huge investment is de facto a sunk cost investment.” Gazprom had stopped transporting gas for Nord Stream. It is a widely shared view among experts that the Nord Stream 2 pipeline would probably never have been put into operation following the Russian Federation’s aggression against Ukraine. The European Union has been working in the past months to phase out Russian gas as soon as possible. In turn, the Russian Federation has pledged to rapidly pilot its gas infrastructure to Asia, particularly China and India.
Turning to the current situation, he underscored the danger posed by the massive methane leak, voicing regret that the Russian Federation has not signed on to the Global Methane Pledge. Satellite pictures of the Russian Federation suggest that Gazprom has been ramping up gas line operations in the past months. Highlighting that the explosions set an extraordinary precedent where energy infrastructure is targeted by sabotage of a sophisticated nature, he stressed: “This should be a concern for Europe and the rest of the world because anything happening in Europe has global implications.”
Statements
DMITRY A. POLYANSKIY (Russian Federation) said that his country’s Prosecutor General’s Office had already begun a criminal proceeding under the act of international terrorism, relating to the sabotage of three of the Nord Stream offshore pipelines. Highlighting several facts relating to the investigation, he said weeks before the special military operations, the United States President said that, if the Russian Federation were to invade, there would no longer be a Nord Stream 2. Large-scale North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Baltic operations exercises occurred in the Baltic Sea in June, where three months later the Nord Stream incidents took place. One of NATO’s main tasks was testing unmanned underwater vehicles and that open data showed United States’ helicopter flight paths coincided with gas pipelines. He concluded that the United States was not hiding its presence in the area on purpose. He also cited former Polish Defence and Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski’s tweet of the leak site, in which he thanked the United States for this sabotage. Moreover, Mr. Sikorski’s wife is well-connected in Washington, D.C. Almost at the same time as the sabotage, the Baltic gas pipeline was opened. Lastly, he cited NATO’s statement on the sabotage warning about strikes against its infrastructure, adding that it was “as though NATO is afraid that someone will retaliate for something”.
The destruction of Nord Stream was hardly beneficial for European States that would become dependent on a more expensive, unreliable supplier — the United States, he said. He pointed to the economic consequences and environmental damage, as well as the impact on the European Commission Nord Stream, a common interest project that had helped the continent move away from dependence on the monopoly — or “theft” — of the Kyiv Government and pursue energy security amid increasing demand. European and United States sanctions have disrupted the gas supply and negatively impacted European industries’ profitability and competitiveness, leading to energy poverty in both developed and developing countries. In that regard, the Russian Federation continues to offer long-term contracts to avoid an energy collapse, he said, and emphasized that it makes no sense for his country to destroy a project it so heavily invested in — if one judges it with common sense and not with “morbid fantasies” that the Russian Federation would do anything to intimidate Europe.
Highlighting that United States’ liquified gas suppliers should now be celebrating now that the last thread ensuring the European Union’s energy independence has been ruptured, he noted that these developments are benefiting the United States and that European residents are left to face their problems alone. In that vein, he asked the United States representative directly if he could confirm that her country was not involved in the sabotage of Nord Stream pipelines. While stressing that the Council is not a judicial body and that answers and preparators will not be found today, he advocated for comprehensive investigations and said that he looked forward to hearing Western States’ statements, urging them to this time refrain from Russophobic verbal gymnastics.
The sabotage’s complexity and scale are beyond the power of ordinary terrorists, he said. Rather it was a deliberate sabotage against a crucial elements of the Russian Federation’s energy infrastructure that must have been conducted by State or State-controlled actors. To that end, he pledged his determination in identifying those involved, adding that they do not have a neutral status to the armed conflict. While highlighting the importance of having Russian and German experts conduct the international investigation to ensure objectivity, he said that, if involvement of States in the terrorist attacks was confirmed, this would mean a deliberate escalation of the conflict. Those who committed the acts are leading the international community to a dangerous brink, he concluded.
MONA JUUL (Norway), expressing concern over the damage to the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines in international waters within the economic zones of Sweden and Denmark, stressed that this has created a serious situation in terms of climate and environmental consequences, as well as risks to shipping. Stating that all currently available information indicates that the damage is the result of deliberate, reckless and irresponsible acts of sabotage, she emphasized that “we need to get to the bottom of what has happened and why, even if it may take some time”. In this regard she expressed support for the investigations launched by Danish and Swedish authorities aimed at getting full clarity. Underscoring that this incident occurred against a backdrop of war and energy crisis in Europe and beyond, she indicated that those responsible “clearly wanted to create fear and insecurity on the European continent”. As a major supplier of gas, she added, her country is aware of the special responsibilities it bears to safeguard security on the Norwegian continental shelf.
JUAN RAMÓN DE LA FUENTE RAMÍREZ (Mexico), in expressing concern over the Nord Stream 1 and  2 pipelines’ leaks, regretted their impact on the environment, international navigation and global energy markets already affected by the war in Ukraine. In light of current and available information, he noted that it seemed unlikely to have been an accident and called for a rigorous and impartial investigation to determine the circumstances which led to the damaging of civilian infrastructure and identify those responsible. This incident should compel the Council to rethink and refocus on finding a solution through dialogue and diplomacy before the conflict continues to escalate further, he added.
MARTIN GALLAGHER (Ireland) expressed deep concern over the sudden and extensive gas leaks detected in the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines earlier this week. The immediate priority must be to ensure maritime safety and avert the risk of a climate and ecological disaster given the potential for a massive and highly damaging emission event. All the analysis to date indicates that the leaks are the result of deliberate acts of sabotage, with at least two detonations underwater, damaging the pipelines and causing major leaks of natural gas into the Baltic Sea. He noted the magnitude of the explosions was measured at 2.3 and 2.1 on the Richter scale, corresponding to an explosive load in the region of several hundred kilogrammes. The irresponsibility of such acts cannot be overstated and must deeply concern all States. That such acts might occur now, amid a global energy crisis and with winter fast approaching, makes it all the more appalling. He stressed that Sweden, Denmark and Germany will have Ireland’s full support in managing the consequences of this indefensible act — also strongly supporting the ongoing investigations in the most affected Member States to determine the full facts behind the leaks. “Let me be clear: any deliberate disruption of European energy infrastructure is utterly unacceptable,” he stressed, and Ireland, along with European Union partners, will ensure that it is met with a robust and united response.
MICHEL XAVIER BIANG (Gabon) said the information presented on significant leaks is cause for great concern over the possibility of a disaster. The scale of the risk and the economic and environmental impacts require an analysis of the level of the threat and effort to avert the consequences of methane escaping into the atmosphere. He expressed hope that measures taken were precautionary and will take into account energy security and the need to supply it at the beginning of winter, voicing hope that the situation will not lead to further hostilities between the warring parties. Recalling that his delegation opposes the war, and that there are strict rules protecting civilians and infrastructure, he reiterated the call for an immediate cessation of hostilities between the warring parties. He called for urgent action to repair the damage and an independent investigation to shed light and establish those responsible.
JAMES KARIUKI (United Kingdom) described Moscow’s request for this meeting as “a cynical attempt to distract from [President Vladimir V.] Putin’s illegal annexation of the Ukrainian territory”. Voicing deep concern over the damage to the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines in the Baltic Sea, he noted that these leaks are not only causing risks to shipping, but also substantial environmental damage in the Baltic Sea as they are releasing enormous amounts of methane into the atmosphere. All currently available information indicates that this is the result of sabotage, he asserted, expressing support for the investigations by the authorities of Denmark, Sweden and Germany, and calling for the establishment of clear international norms that such reckless and intentional damage to civilian infrastructure is unacceptable. Reiterating the commitment NATO allies to prepare for, deter and defend against any hybrid tactics by State and non-State actors — including coercive approaches to energy — he underscored that any deliberate attack against allies’ critical infrastructure would be met with a united and determined response.
RICHARD M. MILLS, JR. (United States), expressing concern over the apparent sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, underscored that deliberate damage of critical infrastructure cannot be tolerated. He supported European investigative efforts currently under way and emphasized that “the search for the truth cannot be rushed”. He then observed that the Russian Federation’s delegation “had a bad day”, as they had to watch that “strangely odd, fascist, Nuremberg-style rally combined-with-a-Las Vegas-1970s-show that happened in Moscow this morning to celebrate the illegal annexation of Ukrainian territory”. They then witnessed the Council sending a message about that annexation in the afternoon, but none of this justifies their repeated presentations of conspiracy theories and mass disinformation in the Council.
Noting that the Russian Federation continues to use inflammatory rhetoric to accuse the United States of being involved in sabotage, he underscored that the United States denies any involvement in these incidents and rejects any assertions to the contrary. As it has been clear, for years, that the Russian Federation is not a reliable energy supplier, the United States has been working with its European partners and allies to increase energy resilience and provide alternative energy supplies. Urging that the sabotage of critical infrastructure should concern all, he recounted numerous instances of Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure and stressed that the Russian Federation must not be allowed to continue to use the Council as a platform to spread disinformation. Recalling that delegation’s earlier statements that the Russian Federation had no intention of invading Ukraine, he said that the United States will not be distracted from seeking justice and accountability.
ZHANG JUN (China), noting that the physical disruption of the Nord Stream pipeline — Europe’s main energy transportation artery which provides vital gas supplies to 23 European countries — a result of the leaks, has exacerbated the region’s energy supply shortage. He noted that consumers around the world, particularly in dependent countries, are likely to suffer from the resulting volatility on the energy markets and the soaring energy prices. Acknowledging that the leakage is still going on, he spotlighted that an impact of this incident on shipping routes and the ecological environment of the surrounding waters, is playing out at the time when Europe and the world are facing intractable challenges. He then affirmed that it is a “great calamity” that China “does not wish to see”. He noted that some of the information indicates that the leaks “this time” have very likely resulted from sabotage. If so, this would constitute an attack on the transnational civilian facilities and submarine pipelines in violation of international law. He also noted that all stakeholders agree that objective, impartial and professional investigation into the leaks is essential. “The leaks this time highlight the vulnerability of transnational infrastructure,” he added, underscoring his country’s readiness to work with all parties to maintain security of cross-border infrastructure.
LANA ZAKI NUSSEIBEH (United Arab Emirates) expressed deep concern over the severe damage to the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines, noting that, while the exact cause remains unknown, the damage appears to have resulted from a deliberate act of sabotage. She called for potential missteps and further escalation to be avoided, at a time of global turmoil, and for the facts to be established through a transparent and comprehensive investigation. She went on to call for the prevention of further volatility and strain in the energy markets, which will place increasing strain on communities around the world, particularly in developing countries. Further, the incident has resulted in a grave environmental disaster with long-term repercussions to the Baltic Sea region and the world, she said, adding that, while the cost is being assessed, it is likely to be one of the worst greenhouse gas leaks ever experienced. Efforts must be made to establish the facts and make sure no further incidents take place.
ALBANA DAUTLLARI (Albania), noting reports that the leaks are the result of a deliberate act of sabotage, stressed that such acts are unacceptable and seriously threaten international security. She voiced support for the investigations under way to find the origin of the damage and the possible perpetrators. Her country shares the international community’s commitment to deter and defend against the misuse of energy by State and non-State actors. Any deliberate act against critical infrastructure should be met with a united response, she added. While the Russian Federation’s military aggression continues in Ukraine, reckless and irresponsible acts of sabotage on critical energy infrastructure may be seen as acts of intimidation of directly affected countries, the Baltic region and the European Union. Stressing that nuclear energy is being used as a weapon for geopolitical gain, she called on the international community to join efforts in promoting energy security and to prevent further threats and actions against that.
JAYNE TOROITICH (Kenya) underscored that Europe and the world cannot afford any escalation or spread of the war in Ukraine as many countries that were already struggling to build back after the COVID-19 pandemic are bearing the brunt of the impact of this war, including a surge in food, energy and farm in-put prices. To this end, she called for an immediate cessation of hostilities to allow space for diplomacy in the search for a political solution that is aligned with the Charter of the United Nations and that safeguards Ukraine’s territorial integrity while being sensitive to the security concerns of all parties.
RAVINDRA RAGUTTAHALLI (India), noting that he is closely following developments concerning the evolving situation, urged relevant sides to exercise restraint and not engage in any activity which may disrupt peace and stability. Any targeting of civilian infrastructure and facilities must be avoided, he stressed. The present incidents have the potential to impact stability in Europe and beyond, apart from negatively affecting the environment. Pointing out that the global South has been disproportionally impacted by the war in Ukraine and its consequences, including those relating to food, fuel and energy, he emphasized that this incident has the potential to further exacerbate the situation if left unchecked. In this regard, he expressed support for an independent and objective investigation. He reiterated the need for an immediate cessation of all hostilities and a return to dialogue and diplomacy.
JOÃO GENÉSIO DE ALMEIDA FILHO (Brazil) noted this week’s incident is a cause for concern for all in light of its potential to further disrupt Europe’s energy security, with rippling effects on the world economy. “We must also be vigilant to the significant environmental impact such a disaster can pose to local maritime life and the amount of greenhouse gases leaked, which threatens our global effort against climate change,” he said. Encouraging the sharing of additional information to Council members on the status of the Nord Stream pipeline on a regular basis, he noted the statements by representatives of the Russian Federation, the European Union and NATO on the episode. It is understandable, given the current challenges in the international system, that there is an impulse to accept hasty explanations about the causes of the leak, based on the motivations attributed to other actors. However, he stressed that an investigation into the events should precede any conclusions. It is in the interest of all to clarify the incident and seek a prompt solution to avoid worsening the energy crisis in Europe. He encouraged those involved to cooperate in the investigation efforts and to work together to ensure that necessary repairs take place as soon as possible.
CAROLYN ABENA ANIMA OPPONG-NTIRI (Ghana), expressing concern over the damage caused to the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines, which resulted in the leakage of methane gas in the area, noted that the leakage has necessitated the demarcation of a “no sail” zone and caused disruptions to maritime straits that traverse the affected area. Also showing concern over the immediate and potential long-term damage to the marine environment and climate, she underscored that urgent and independent investigations are necessary to determine the circumstances leading to the leakage and to guide appropriate remedial action, including ensuring accountability for any persons or State found to have been complicit. The safety and security of the European energy infrastructure, she added, requires the concerted efforts of all Member States and the wider international community to prevent foreseeable interruptions in services critical to the survival of the people who rely on them. Recalling Council resolution 2341 (2017) encouraging cooperation to ensure the safety and protection of critical infrastructure, she called on all stakeholders to work closely to resolve any issues affecting the security of the Nord Stream gas pipelines and other such infrastructure. She also urged restraint by all parties concerned and cautioned against unilateral actions.
NICOLAS DE RIVIÈRE (France), Council President for September, speaking in his national capacity, voiced concern about the two underwater explosions that hit the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines on 27 September and resulted in four methane leaks off the Danish island of Bornholm — which are unprecedented events. He expressed full solidarity with Denmark and Sweden, which are directly affected by their security and environmental consequences — a very serious situation. All available information indicates that the leaks were the result of a deliberate act of sabotage, he stressed, with two seismic events recorded before the leaks occurred: measurements indicated explosions equivalent to 500 kilogrammes of trinitrotoluene. “So, this not a coincidence,” he stressed. “These events are human in source.” He denounced the irresponsible act, which endangers maritime navigation and the environment. The coercive use of energy is unacceptable, and he called for light to be shed on the source of the explosions and support investigations that will be carried out by the countries concerned. Any deliberate attempt to attack critical infrastructure is intolerable and must be considered a hostile act. The European Union will respond firmly to this attack on its energy infrastructure, as it would towards any attempt to attack the safety of its supply.
Mr. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation), taking the floor a second time, acknowledged the United States’ direct response denying any involvement in the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines and asked the United States to clarify what he and the representative from the United Kingdom meant by “Russian disinformation and conspiracy theories” when the Russian Federation has only cited facts. He then referred to the words of the United States’ President, NATO’s exercises near Bornholm, the tweet by Poland’s Foreign Minister thanking the United States on the pipeline, opening of the Baltic pipeline and NATO’s announcement following its strikes as examples of facts. “Will you deny that the current energy crisis in Europe is objectively increasing the competitiveness of United States energy producers?”, he questioned. While he had not previously linked the Nord Stream incident with the situation in Ukraine, he could now see that Western colleagues are considering this act of sabotage as a form of revenge for the Russian Federation’s actions in Ukraine. That statement, he noted, narrows down the suspects and can greatly help the investigation.
Mr. MILLS JR. (United States), taking the floor a second time, underscored that the United States categorically denies any involvement in these incidents. He recalled his previous statement, and those by briefers, that the energy situation in Europe is affected more by the Russian Federation’s unreliability as an energy supplier than anything to do with the United States. Pointing out that the Russian Federation has a record, over the last seven months, of destroying civilian infrastructure across Ukraine, he stated that, if any country has a record of doing the sort of things being discussed at this meeting, it is not the United States.
Mr. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation) requested the floor for Mr. Kupriyanov to deliver a brief comment.
Mr. DE RIVIÈRE (France), in his capacity as Council President for September, said that, while he did not intend to give the floor back to the briefers, the Russian Federation could as the “majority owner of Gazprom”.
Mr. KUPRIYANOV began to express his disagreement with Mr. Eyl-Mazzega’s overview of the gas market.
Mr. DE RIVIÈRE (France) interrupted, stating: “I did not give you the floor. The representative of the Russian Federation has the floor.”
Mr. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation) said he could not speak for Gazprom and was simply passing along a request for the floor.
Mr. DE RIVIÈRE (France) noted he was pleased Gazprom can ask for the floor through the Russian Federation and added that, if the owner wished to speak, he could. Otherwise, the meeting would be adjourned.
Mr. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation), in valuing the President’s irony, clarified that Gazprom communicated their request through the Russian Federation because they had the means to and not because of the Russian Federation’s position as majority shareholder.
Mr. DE RIVIÈRE (France), in emphasizing the Gazprom representative’s opportunity to speak alongside other participants, adjourned the meeting.

Source: United Nations